Core Evaluation Framework
Every game is evaluated across six weighted categories. Each category contributes a fixed percentage to the final rating.
Game Mathematics - 30%
RTP
Weight 10%
Score 0-10
Notes Base RTP + presence of alternative RTP versions
Volatility
Weight 8%
Score 0-10
Notes Alignment with declared variance
Max Win
Weight 7%
Score 0-10
Notes Maximum payout multiplier
Hit Frequency / Trigger Rate
Weight 5%
Score 0-10
Notes Bonus frequency or win cycle behavior
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTP | 10% | 0-10 | Base RTP + presence of alternative RTP versions |
| Volatility | 8% | 0-10 | Alignment with declared variance |
| Max Win | 7% | 0-10 | Maximum payout multiplier |
| Hit Frequency / Trigger Rate | 5% | 0-10 | Bonus frequency or win cycle behavior |
Scoring Logic
- 9-10 => Strong and competitive math for its segment
- 6-8 => Market standard
- 3-5 => Below average
- 0-2 => Weak or unclear parameters
Feature Depth - 20%
Bonus Mechanics
Weight 8%
Score 0-10
Notes Structure and depth of bonus rounds
Extra Features
Weight 5%
Score 0-10
Notes Bonus Buy, Gamble, Ante Bet, etc.
Win Mechanics
Weight 4%
Score 0-10
Notes Megaways, Cluster Pays, Crash format, etc.
Replay Value
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Variation in gameplay across sessions
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonus Mechanics | 8% | 0-10 | Structure and depth of bonus rounds |
| Extra Features | 5% | 0-10 | Bonus Buy, Gamble, Ante Bet, etc. |
| Win Mechanics | 4% | 0-10 | Megaways, Cluster Pays, Crash format, etc. |
| Replay Value | 4% | 0-10 | Variation in gameplay across sessions |
Design & UX - 15%
Visual Design
Weight 6%
Score 0-10
Notes Graphic quality and clarity
Sound Design
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Audio balance and relevance
Interface Clarity
Weight 4%
Score 0-10
Notes UI logic and readability
Mobile Optimization
Weight 2%
Score 0-10
Notes Performance and responsiveness
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Design | 6% | 0-10 | Graphic quality and clarity |
| Sound Design | 3% | 0-10 | Audio balance and relevance |
| Interface Clarity | 4% | 0-10 | UI logic and readability |
| Mobile Optimization | 2% | 0-10 | Performance and responsiveness |
Market Position - 15%
Competitiveness vs Similar Games
Weight 6%
Score 0-10
Notes Comparison with similar titles
Provider Reputation
Weight 4%
Score 0-10
Notes Developer reliability and track record
Distribution
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Availability across licensed casinos
Longevity / Popularity
Weight 2%
Score 0-10
Notes Sustained player interest
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competitiveness vs Similar Games | 6% | 0-10 | Comparison with similar titles |
| Provider Reputation | 4% | 0-10 | Developer reliability and track record |
| Distribution | 3% | 0-10 | Availability across licensed casinos |
| Longevity / Popularity | 2% | 0-10 | Sustained player interest |
Risk Profile & Player Suitability - 10%
Bankroll Friendliness
Weight 4%
Score 0-10
Notes Suitable bet range for low stakes
Risk Transparency
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Clarity of volatility and mechanics
Session Stability
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Variance behavior over time
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bankroll Friendliness | 4% | 0-10 | Suitable bet range for low stakes |
| Risk Transparency | 3% | 0-10 | Clarity of volatility and mechanics |
| Session Stability | 3% | 0-10 | Variance behavior over time |
Technical Integrity - 10%
Licensing & Certification
Weight 4%
Score 0-10
Notes RNG testing and audit availability
Stability & Bugs
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Technical reliability
Weight 3%
Score 0-10
Notes Performance on desktop and mobile
| Category | Weight | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing & Certification | 4% | 0-10 | RNG testing and audit availability |
| Stability & Bugs | 3% | 0-10 | Technical reliability |
| Load Speed | 3% | 0-10 | Performance on desktop and mobile |
Final Score Calculation
The final rating is calculated using a weighted average:
Final Score = Σ (Category Score x Category Weight)
Example Calculation
Game Mathematics
Weight 30%
Avg Score 8.5
Weighted Result 2.55
Feature Depth
Weight 20%
Avg Score 7.0
Weighted Result 1.40
Design & UX
Weight 15%
Avg Score 8.0
Weighted Result 1.20
Market Position
Weight 15%
Avg Score 7.5
Weighted Result 1.13
Risk Profile
Weight 10%
Avg Score 6.5
Weighted Result 0.65
Technical Integrity
Weight 10%
Avg Score 9.0
Weighted Result 0.90
| Section | Weight | Avg Score | Weighted Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Game Mathematics | 30% | 8.5 | 2.55 |
| Feature Depth | 20% | 7.0 | 1.40 |
| Design & UX | 15% | 8.0 | 1.20 |
| Market Position | 15% | 7.5 | 1.13 |
| Risk Profile | 10% | 6.5 | 0.65 |
| Technical Integrity | 10% | 9.0 | 0.90 |
Final Rating = 7.83 / 10
Rating Scale Interpretation
Rating
9.0 - 10 Industry benchmark
8.0 - 8.9 Strong competitive title
7.0 - 7.9 Solid but replaceable
6.0 - 6.9 Average
5.0 - 5.9 Below market
Below 5 Weak product
| Final Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 9.0 - 10 | Industry benchmark |
| 8.0 - 8.9 | Strong competitive title |
| 7.0 - 7.9 | Solid but replaceable |
| 6.0 - 6.9 | Average |
| 5.0 - 5.9 | Below market |
| Below 5 | Weak product |
Evaluation Principles
- Personal taste is excluded from scoring.
- Games are compared only within their segment (e.g., high-volatility slots vs high-volatility slots).
- Mathematical data is prioritized over visual appeal.
- Alternative RTP versions are noted separately.
- If Bonus Buy changes expected value (EV), it is documented.
Adaptation by Game Type
While the framework remains consistent, weight distribution may shift slightly depending on format:
Relation
Slots Default structure
Crash Games Increase weight of Risk Profile
Instant Games Increase weight of Mathematics
Live Casino Increase weight of Technical & UX
| Game Type | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| Slots | Default structure |
| Crash Games | Increase weight of Risk Profile |
| Instant Games | Increase weight of Mathematics |
| Live Casino | Increase weight of Technical & UX |
What Readers See on Each Game Review Page
Each individual game review includes:
- A final numeric score
- A weighted breakdown table
- A short analytical summary
- A link to this methodology page for transparency
Example:
Final Rating: 8.1 / 10
See full scoring methodology: How We Rate Casino Games
